Enrollment Management Solutions provide a comprehensive ongoing assessment of your institution’s enrollment process. Hanover’s team of experts will evaluate the effectiveness of your current enrollment initiatives and pinpoint areas for improvement throughout your enrollment funnel, from targeting the right applicants to maximizing matriculation rates.
We help you answer key questions and develop strategies for success:
Where are the inefficiencies in our institution’s enrollment process?
How (and where) should we target our recruiting efforts?
Why did students decide not to matriculate and where did they attend instead?
What factors would have changed a non-matriculant’s decision to attend?
We will customize an approach for your institution that leverages the expertise of our team and multiple methodologies to support your institution’s goals.
Pre-Enrollment Funnel Dashboard
Evaluate the health of the current enrollment process.
Studies an institution’s inquiry-to-matriculation pipeline and unpacks where an institution is performing well and where (and more importantly why) it is encountering enrollment inefficiencies.
Geomarket Opportunity Dashboard
Target the optimal applicant pool.
Geographically maps where an institution is sourcing its applicants across the country, defines attractive student profiles via key demographics, and spots new untapped geographic regions to target recruiting efforts.
Enrollment Choice Survey
Maximize applicant completion and student acceptance.
Provides a customized online survey of matriculants and/or non-matriculants to assess matriculation drivers, gauge the relative strength of an institution’s brand, and spot institutional opportunities for improvement.
Identify annual and longitudinal enrollment trends
Scan for potential drivers of enrollment inefficiencies
Visualize geographic recommendations for targeted recruitment
We decided to partner with Hanover due to our need for a full-service firm to provide wrap-around support in a way that would expand the capacity of my sponsored programs office. One of my main goals for the year is to increase the success rate of our federal sponsored program proposals so that I can also increase the amount of indirect costs to the university. I will be using Hanover for our federal funding opportunities so that I can demonstrate the value and return on investment of using such a firm for these valuable pre-award services. Hanover’s proposal support and development services will be critical for CMU at this stage of our research enterprise expansion; I even want to use Hanover to go through some declined proposals and peer review summaries to advise our faculty on how to strengthen their proposals, so we can resubmit them. I don’t know of any other vendors with comprehensive services like Hanover.
Cheryl K. Green, Ph.D., Director of Sponsored Programs